ЖИВОТ И ДЕЛО РАДОВАНА ДРАГОВИЋА СРПСКА АКАДЕМИЈА НАУКА И УМЕТНОСТИ Б е о г р а д 1 9 8 7 НАУЧНИ СКУПОВИ Р е ф е р е н ц е Радован Драговић Србија Српски социјалисти Оснивање Српске социјадемократске партије Идеолошке борбе Раднички покрет Србије 1902. године Радован Драговић у образованју радничке класе у Србији Радован Драговић као новинар и уредник Борба за слободу штампе Пролетерски морал и хуманизам `Првомајски спис` из времена Радована Драговића ......................................................... Фотографије Брош Ћирилица 2 6 О страница НЕКОРИШЋЕНО Екстра !

Dijalektički i istorijski materijalizam Stenografske beleške sa predavanja na institutu društvenih nauka `Dijalektički materijalizam je filozofija nauke i prirode, velikim delom razvijena u delu Karla Marksa i Fridriha Engelsa.[1][2] Uprkos nominalnom materijalizmu, umesto pokušaja da se svet objasni u terminima osnovne supstancije zajedničke različitim stvarima, dijalektički materijalizam pokušava da objasni prirodu i ponašanje stvari u skladu sa načinom na koji su one organizovane i kako se razvijaju; filozof otuda zauzima istorijski pristup proučavanju stvari ili materije...` Vikipedija Boris Zihler, Bjelinski, Černiševski, Dobroljubov... Izdavač: Beograd Godina: 1949 Broj strana: 132 Meki povez Biblioteka: Ocena: 4. Vidi slike. Skladište: 5600/II Težina: 120 grama NOVI CENOVNIK pošte za preporučenu tiskovinu od 18.03.2021. godine. do 100 gr - 82 dinara 101-250 gr - 92 dinara 251-500 gr – 120 dinara 501-1000gr - 130 dinara 1001-2000 gr - 158 dinara Tiskovina ubuduće ne može da pređe 2 kg. U SLUČAJU KUPOVINE VIŠE ARTIKLA MOGUĆ POPUST OD 10 DO 20 POSTO. DOGOVOR PUTEM PORUKE NA KUPINDO. Pogledajte ostale moje aukcije na Kupindo http://www.kupindo.com/Clan/Ljubab/SpisakPredmeta Pogledajte ostale moje aukcije na Limundo http://www.limundo.com/Clan/Ljubab/SpisakAukcija

Dela A.N. Majkova 1884! RUS tom drugi tvrd kozni povez sjajno ocuvano posebno posle 135 godina! posveta ruski pisac skupljao prevodio i srpske epske pesme vidi slike! jako retko i vredno S. Peterburg 494 strane francuski povez Lib 20 Majkov Apolon Nikolajevič (Apollon Nikolaevič), ruski pesnik (Moskva, 4. VI. 1821 – Sankt Peterburg, 20. III. 1897). Studirao pravo; radio kao knjižar, od 1852. cenzor. Pristalica »naturalne škole« (poema Mašenka, 1846), poslije historicist (Kraj groba Groznoga – U groba Groznogo, 1887) i religijsko-filozofski lirik (mistifikacija Iz Apollodora Gnostika, 1877–93). U pjesništvu prevladavaju antički i talijanski motivi, krajolici. Objavio ciklus Iz slavenskog svijeta (Iz slavjanskogo mira, 1870–80). Apollon Nikolayevich Maykov (Russian: Аполло́н Никола́евич Ма́йков, June 4 [O.S. May 23] 1821, Moscow – March 20 [O.S. March 8] 1897, Saint Petersburg) was a Russian poet, best known for his lyric verse showcasing images of Russian villages, nature, and history. His love for ancient Greece and Rome, which he studied for much of his life, is also reflected in his works. Maykov spent four years translating the epic The Tale of Igor`s Campaign (1870) into modern Russian. He translated the folklore of Belarus, Greece, Serbia and Spain, as well as works by Heine, Adam Mickiewicz and Goethe, among others. Several of Maykov`s poems were set to music by Russian composers, among them Rimsky-Korsakov and Tchaikovsky. Maykov was born into an artistic family and educated at home, by the writer Ivan Goncharov, among others. At the age of 15, he began writing his first poetry. After finishing his gymnasium course in just three years, he enrolled in Saint Petersburg University in 1837. He began publishing his poems in 1840, and came out with his first collection in 1842. The collection was reviewed favorably by the influential critic Vissarion Belinsky. After this, he traveled throughout Europe, returning to Saint Petersburg in 1844, where he continued to publish poetry and branched out into literary criticism and essay writing. He continued writing throughout his life, wavering several times between the conservative and liberal camps, but maintaining a steady output of quality poetical works. In his liberal days he was close to Belinsky, Nikolay Nekrasov, and Ivan Turgenev, while in his conservative periods he was close to Fyodor Dostoyevsky. He ended his life as a conservative. Maykov died in Saint Petersburg On March 8, 1897. Contents 1 Biography 1.1 Literary career 1.1.1 Maykov and revolutionary democrats 1.1.2 The Tale of Igor`s Campaign 1.1.3 Christianity and paganism 1.1.4 Last years 2 Legacy 3 Selected bibliography 3.1 Poetry collections 3.2 Dramas 3.3 Major poems 4 Notes 5 References 6 External links Biography Apollon Maykov was born into an artistic family. His father, Nikolay Maykov, was a painter, and in his later years an academic of the Imperial Academy of Arts. His mother, Yevgeniya Petrovna Maykova (née Gusyatnikova, 1803–1880), loved literature and later in life had some of her own poetry published.[1] The boy`s childhood was spent at the family estate just outside Moscow, in a house often visited by writers and artists.[2] Maykov`s early memories and impressions formed the foundation for his much lauded landscape lyricism, marked by what biographer Igor Yampolsky calls `a touchingly naive love for the old patriarchal ways.`[3] In 1834 the family moved to Saint Petersburg. Apollon and his brother Valerian were educated at home, under the guidance of their father`s friend Vladimir Solonitsyn, a writer, philologist and translator, known also for Nikolay Maykov`s 1839 portrait of him. Ivan Goncharov, then an unknown young author, taught Russian literature to the Maykov brothers. As he later remembered, the house `was full of life, and had many visitors, providing a never ceasing flow of information from all kinds of intellectual spheres, including science and the arts.`[4] At the age of 15 Apollon started to write poetry.[5] With a group of friends (Vladimir Benediktov, Ivan Goncharov and Pavel Svinyin among others) the Maykov brothers edited two hand-written magazines, Podsnezhnik (Snow-drop) and Moonlit Nights, where Apollon`s early poetry appeared for the first time.[1] Maykov finished his whole gymnasium course in just three years,[3] and in 1837 enrolled in Saint Petersburg University`s law faculty. As a student he learned Latin which enabled him to read Ancient Roman authors in the original texts. He later learned Ancient Greek, but until then had to content himself with French translations of the Greek classics. It was at the university that Maykov developed his passionate love of Ancient Greece and Rome.[3] Literary career Apollon Maykov`s first poems (signed `M.`) were published in 1840 by the Odessa Almanac and in 1841 by Biblioteka Dlya Chteniya and Otechestvennye Zapiski. He also studied painting, but soon chose to devote himself entirely to poetry. Instrumental in this decision was Pyotr Pletnyov, a University professor who, acting as a mentor for the young man, showed the first poems of his protégé to such literary giants as Vasily Zhukovsky and Nikolai Gogol. Maykov never became a painter, but the lessons he received greatly influenced his artistic worldview and writing style.[1] In 1842 his first collection Poems by A.N. Maykov was published, to much acclaim. `For me it sounds like Delvig`s ideas expressed by Pushkin,` Pletnyov wrote.[6] Vissarion Belinsky responded with a comprehensive essay,[7] praising the book`s first section called `Poems Written for an Anthology`, a cycle of verses stylized after both ancient Greek epigrams and the traditional elegy. He was flattered by the famous critic`s close attention.[note 1] Maykov paid heed to his advice and years later, working on the re-issues, edited much of the text in direct accordance with Belinsky`s views.[8] After graduating from the university, Maykov joined the Russian Ministry of Finance as a clerk. Having received a stipend for his first book from Tsar Nicholas I, he used the money to travel abroad, visiting Italy (where he spent most of his time writing poetry and painting), France, Saxony, and Austria. In Paris Apollon and Valerian attended lectures on literature and fine arts at the Sorbonne and the College de France.[5] On his way back Maykov visited Dresden and Prague where he met Vaclav Hanka and Pavel Jozef Safarik, the two leaders of the national revival movement.[3] The direct outcome of this voyage for Apollon Maykov was a University dissertation on the history of law in Eastern Europe.[5] Maykov circa 1850 In 1844 Maykov returned to Saint Petersburg to join the Rumyantsev Museum library as an assistant. He became actively involved with the literary life of the Russian capital, contributing to Otechestvennye Zapiski, Finsky Vestnik and Sovremennik. He also debuted as a critic and published several essays on literature and fine art, reviewing works by artists like Ivan Aivazovsky, Fyodor Tolstoy and Pavel Fedotov.[1] In 1846 the Petersburg Anthology published his poem `Mashenka`, which saw Maykov discarding elegy and leaning towards a more down-to-Earth style of writing. Again Belinsky was impressed, hailing the arrival of `a new talent, quite capable of presenting real life in its true light.`[9] The critic also liked Two Fates (Saint Petersburg, 1845). A `natural school` piece, touched by Mikhail Lermontov`s influence, it featured `a Pechorin-type character, an intelligent, thinking nobleman retrogressing into a low-brow philistine,` according to Alexander Hertzen`s review.[10] In the late 1840s Maykov was also writing prose, in a Gogol-influenced style known as the `physiological sketch`. Among the short stories he published at the time were `Uncle`s Will` (1847) and `The Old Woman – Fragments from the Notes of a Virtuous Man` (1848).[1] In the late 1840s Maykov entered Belinsky`s circle and became friends with Nikolai Nekrasov and Ivan Turgenev. Along with his brother Valerian he started to attend Mikhail Petrashevsky`s `Secret Fridays`, establishing contacts with Fyodor Dostoyevsky and Aleksey Pleshcheyev. Later, having been interrogated about his involvement, Maykov avoided arrest (he did not have a significant role in the group`s activities), but for several years was kept under secret police surveillance.[1] In the years to come Maykov, who never believed in the ideas of socialism, often expressed embarrassment over his involvement in the Petrashevsky affair. In an 1854 letter to M. A. Yazykov he confessed: `At the time I had very vague political ideas and was foolish enough to join a group where all the government`s actions were criticized and condemned as wrong a priory, many of [its members] applauding every mistake, according to the logic of `the worse they rule, the quicker they`ll fall`.[11] In the 1850s Maykov, now a Slavophile, began to champion `firm` monarchy and strong Orthodox values.[2] Writing to Aleksandr Nikitenko he argued: `Only a form of political system which had been proven by the test of history could be called viable`.[12] In 1852 Maykov moved into the office of the Russian Committee of Foreign censorship, where he continued working for the rest of his life, becoming its chairman in 1882.[1] In 1847 Maykov`s second collection of poems, Sketches of Rome, the artistic outcome of his earlier European trip, was published. Informed with Belinsky`s criticism, some poems were built on the juxtaposition of the majestic ruins and lush landscapes of `classic` Rome with the everyday squalor of contemporary Italy. This homage to the `natural school` movement, though, did not make Maykov`s style less flamboyant; on the contrary, it was in Sketches of Rome that he started to make full use of exotic epithets and colorful imagery.[1] In 1848–1852 Maykov wrote little, but became active during the Crimean War. First came the poem `Claremont Cathedral` (1853), an ode to Russia`s historical feat of preventing the Mongol hordes from devastating European civilization.[note 2] This was followed by the compilation Poems, 1854. Some of the poems, like those about the siege of Sevastopol (`To General-Lieutenant Khrulyov`) were welcomed by the literary left (notably Nekrasov and Chernyshevsky). Others (`In Memory of Derzhavin` and `A Message to the Camp`) were seen as glorifying the monarchy and were deemed `reactionary`.[13] The last 1854 poem, `The Harlequin`, was a caricature on a revolutionary keen to bring chaos and undermine centuries-old moral principles.[13] Now a `patriarchal monarchist`, Maykov started to praise the Nikolai I regime. Another poem, `The Carriage`, where Maykov openly supported the Tsar, was not included in 1854, but circulated in its hand-written version and did his reputation a lot of harm. Enemies either ridiculed the poet or accused him of political opportunism and base flattery. Some of his friends were positively horrified. In his epigrams, poet Nikolay Shcherbina labeled Maykov `chameleon` and `servile slave`.[1] While social democrats (who dominated the Russian literary scene of the time) saw political and social reforms as necessary for Russia, Maykov called for the strengthening of state power.[13] After Russia`s defeat in the war the tone of Maykov`s poetry changed. Poems like `The war is over. Vile peace is signed...`, `Whirlwind` (both 1856), `He and Her` (1867) criticized corrupt high society and weak, inadequate officials who were indifferent to the woes of the country and its people.[13] Now openly critical of Nikolai I, Maykov admitted to having been wrong when professing a belief in the monarch.[14] Maykov in the 1850s In 1858 Maykov took part in the expedition to Greece on board the corvette Bayan. Prior to that he read numerous books about the country and learned the modern Greek language. Two books came out as a result of this trip: The Naples Album (which included `Tarantella`, one of his best known poems) and Songs of Modern Greece. The former, focusing on contemporary Italian life, was coldly received by Russian critics who found it too eclectic. In retrospect it is regarded as a curious experiment in breaking genre barriers, with images and conversations from foreign life used to express things which in Russia could not be commented on publicly at the time.[13] In the latter, the author`s sympathy for the Greek liberation movement is evident.[3] The early 1860s saw Maykov`s popularity on the rise: he often performed in public and had his works published by the leading Russian magazines.[15] In the mid-1860s he once again drifted towards the conservative camp, and stayed there for the rest of his life. He condemned young radicals, and expressed solidarity with Mikhail Katkov`s nationalistic remarks regarding the Polish Uprising and Russian national policy in general. In poems like `Fields` (which employed Gogol`s metaphor of Russia as a troika, but also expressed horror at emerging capitalism),[13] `Niva` and `The Sketch` he praised the 1861 reforms, provoking sharp criticism from Saltykov-Schedrin[16] and Nikolay Dobrolyubov.[2] Adopting the Pochvennichestvo doctrine, Maykov became close to Apollon Grigoriev, Nikolai Strakhov, and Fyodor Dostoyevsky; his friendship with the latter proved to be a particularly firm and lasting one.[1] In the 1860s and 1870s Maykov contributed mainly to Russky Vestnik.[3] One of the leading proponents of Russian Panslavism, he saw his country as fulfilling its mission in uniting Slavs, but first and foremost freeing the peoples of the Balkans from Turkish occupation. `Once you`ve seen Russia in this [Panslavic] perspective, you start to understand its true nature and feel ready to devote yourself to this life-affirming cause,` wrote Maykov in a letter to Dostoyevsky.[17] The mission of art, according to the poet, was to develop the national self-consciousness and revive the `historical memory` of Russians. The Slavic historic and moral basis on which it stood became the major theme of Maykov`s poetry cycles `Of the Slavic World`, `At Home`, and `Callings of History`. Well aware of the darker side of Russia`s historic legacy, he still thought it necessary to highlight its `shining moments` (`It`s dear to me, before the icon...`, 1868). Maykov was not a religious person himself but attributed great importance to the religious fervor of the common people, seeing it as the basis for `moral wholesomeness` (`The spring, like an artist`, 1859; `Ignored by all...`, 1872). His religious poems of the late 1880s (`Let go, let go...`, `The sunset’s quiet shine...`, `Eternal night is near...`) differed radically from his earlier odes to paganism. In them Maykov professed a belief in spiritual humility and expressed the conviction that this particular feature of the Russian national character would be its saving grace.[13] Maykov and revolutionary democrats Unlike his artistic ally Afanasy Fet, Maykov always felt the need for maintaining `spiritual bonds` with common people and, according to biographer Yampolsky, followed `the folk tradition set by Pushkin, Lermontov, Krylov and Koltsov`.[3] Yet he was skeptical of the doctrine of narodnost as formulated by Dobrolyubov and Chernyshevsky, who saw active promotion of the democratic movement as the mission of Russian literature. In 1853, horrified by Nekrasov`s poem `The Muse`, Maykov wrote `An Epistle to Nekrasov`, in which he urged the latter to `dilute his malice in nature`s harmony.` Yet he never severed ties with his opponent and often gave him credit. `There is only one poetic soul here, and that is Nekrasov,` Maykov wrote in an October 1854 letter to Ivan Nikitin.[18] According to Yampolsky, Nekrasov`s poem `Grandfather` (1870, telling the story of a nobleman supporting the revolutionary cause) might have been an indirect answer to Maykov`s poem `Grandmother` (1861) which praised the high moral standards of the nobility and condemned the generation of nihilists. Maykov`s poem Princess (1876) had its heroine Zhenya, a girl from an aristocratic family, join a gang of conspirators and lose all notions of normality, religious, social or moral. However, unlike Vsevolod Krestovsky or Viktor Klyushnikov, Maykov treated his `nihilist` characters rather like victims of the post-Crimean war social depression rather than villains in their own right.[3] The Tale of Igor`s Campaign Seeking inspiration and moral virtue in Russian folklore, which he called `the treasury of the Russian soul`, Maykov tried to revive the archaic Russian language tradition.[19] In his later years he made numerous freestyle translations and stylized renditions of Belarussian and Serbian folk songs. He developed a strong interest in non-Slavic folklore too, exemplified by the epic poems Baldur (1870) and Bringilda (1888) based on the Scandinavian epos.[3] In the late 1860s Maykov became intrigued by The Tale of Igor`s Campaign, which his son was studying in gymnasium at the time. Baffled by the vagueness and occasional incongruity of all the available translations, he shared his doubts with professor Izmail Sreznevsky, who replied: `It is for you to sort these things out.` Maykov later described the four years of work on the new translation that followed as his `second university`.[3] His major objective was to come up with undeniable proof of the authenticity of the old text, something that many authors, Ivan Goncharov among them, expressed doubts about. Ignoring Dostoyevsky`s advice to use rhymes so as to make the text sound more modern, Maykov provided the first ever scientifically substantiated translation of the document, supplied with comprehensive commentaries. First published in the January 1870 issue of Zarya magazine, it is still regarded as one of the finest achievements of his career.[13] For Maykov, who took his historical poems and plays seriously, authenticity was the main objective. In his Old Believers drama The Wanderer (1867), he used the hand-written literature of raskolniks and, `having discovered those poetic gems, tried to re-mold them into... modern poetic forms,` as he explained in the preface.[20][13] In his historical works Maykov often had contemporary Russian issues in mind. `While writing of ancient history I was looking for parallels to the things that I had to live through. Our times provide so many examples of the rise and fall of the human spirit that an attentive eye looking for analogies can spot a lot,` he wrote.[21] Christianity and paganism Maykov in his later years Maykov`s first foray into the history of early Christianity, `Olynthus and Esther` (1841) was criticized by Belinsky. He returned to this theme ten years later in the lyrical drama Three Deaths (1857), was dissatisfied with the result, and went on to produce part two, `The Death of Lucius` (1863). Three Deaths became the starting point of his next big poem, Two Worlds, written in 1872, then re-worked and finished in 1881. Following Belinsky`s early advice, Maykov abandoned Lucius, a weak Epicurean, and made the new hero Decius, a patrician who, while hating Nero, still hopes for the state to rise up from its ashes.[13] Like Sketches of Rome decades earlier, Two Worlds was a eulogy to Rome`s eternal glory, its hero fighting Christianity, driven by the belief that Rome is another Heaven, `its dome embracing Earth.`[5] While in his earlier years Maykov was greatly intrigued by antiquity, later in life he became more interested in Christianity and its dramatic stand against oppressors. While some contemporaries praised Maykov for his objectivity and scholarly attitude, the Orthodox Christian critics considered him to be `too much of a heathen` who failed to show Christianity in its true historical perspective.[22] Later literary historians viewed Maykov`s historical dramas favourably, crediting the author for neutrality and insight. Maykov`s antiquity `lives and breathes, it is anything but dull,` wrote critic F. Zelinsky in 1908.[23] For the Two Worlds Maykov received The Russian Academy of Sciences` Pushkin Prize in 1882.[1] Last years In 1858 Grigory Kushelev-Bezborodko published the first Maykov anthology Poems by Ap. Maykov. In 1879 it was expanded and re-issued by Vladimir Meshchersky. The Complete Maykov came out in 1884 (its second edition following in 1893).[5] In the 1880s Maykov`s poetry was dominated by religious and nationalistic themes and ideas. According to I. Yampolsky, only a few of his later poems (`Emshan`, `The Spring`, 1881) had `indisputable artistic quality`.[3] In his later years the poet wrote almost nothing new, engaging mostly in editing his earlier work and preparing them for compilations and anthologies. `Maykov lived the quiet, radiant life of an artist, evidently not belonging to our times... his path was smooth and full of light. No strife, no passions, no persecution,` wrote Dmitry Merezhkovsky in 1908.[24] Although this generalization was far from the truth, according to biographer F. Priyma, it certainly expressed the general public`s perception of him.[13] Apollon Maykov died in Saint Petersburg On March 8, 1897. `His legacy will always sound as the mighty, harmonious and very complicated final chord to the Pushkin period of Russian poetry,` wrote Arseny Golenishchev-Kutuzov in the Ministry of Education`s obituary.[25] Legacy Maykov`s initial rise to fame, according to the Soviet scholar Fyodor Pryima, had a lot to do with Pushkin and Lermontov`s untimely deaths, and the feeling of desolation shared by many Russian intellectuals of the time.[13] Vissarion Belinsky, who discovered this new talent, believed it was up to Maykov to fill this vacuum. `The emergence of this new talent is especially important in our times, when in the devastated Church of Art... we see but grimacing jesters entertaining dumb obscurants, egotistic mediocrities, merchants and speculators,` Belinsky wrote, reviewing Maykov`s debut collection.[26] The sleeve of Poems by Apollon Maykov in 2 volumes, 1858. Hailing the emergence of a new powerful talent, Belinsky unreservedly supported the young author`s `anthological` stylizations based upon the poetry of Ancient Greece, praising `the plasticity and gracefulness of the imagery,` the virtuosity in the art of the decorative, the `poetic, lively language` but also the simplicity and lack of pretentiousness.[27] `Even in Pushkin`s legacy this poem would have rated among his best anthological pieces,` Belinsky wrote about the poem called `The Dream`.[28] Still, he advised the author to leave the `anthological` realm behind as soon as possible[29] and expressed dissatisfaction with poems on Russia`s recent history. While admitting `Who`s He` (a piece on Peter the Great, which some years later found its way into textbooks) was `not bad`, Belinsky lambasted `Two Coffins`, a hymn to Russia`s victories over Karl XII and Napoleon. Maykov`s debut collection made him one of the leading Russian poets. In the 1840s `his lexical and rhythmic patterns became more diverse but the style remained the same, still relying upon the basics of classical elegy,` according to the biographer Mayorova, who noted a strange dichotomy between the flamboyant wording and static imagery, and pointed to the `insurmountable distance between the poet and the world he pictured.`[1] After Belinsky`s death, Maykov started to waver between the two camps of the Westernizers and the Slavophiles, and the critics, accordingly, started to treat his work on the basis of their own political views in relation to the poet`s changing ideological stance. Maykov`s 1840s` `natural school`- influenced poems were praised (and published)[30] by Nikolay Nekrasov. His later works, expressing conservative, monarchist and anti-`nihilist` views, were supported by Dostoyevsky, who on more than one occasion pronounced Maykov Russia`s major poet.[13][31] In his 1895 article for the Brockhaus and Efron Encyclopedic Dictionary, the philosopher and critic Vladimir Solovyov argued that Maykov`s dominant characteristics were `a serene, contemplating tone, elaborate patterns, a distinct and individual style (in form, although not in colors) with a relatively lackluster lyric side, the latter suffering obviously from too much attention to details, often at the expense of the original inspiration.` Maykov`s best works were, the critic opined, `powerful and expressive, even if not exceptionally sonorous.`[5] Speaking of Maykov`s subject matter, Solovyov was almost dismissive: Two major themes form the foundation of Maykov`s poetry, the Ancient Greek aesthetic and historical myths of the Byzantine-Russian politics; bonded only by the poet`s unreserved love for both, never merge... The concept of Byzantium, as the second Rome, though, has not crystallized as clear and distinct in the poet`s mind as that of the original Roman Empire. He loves Byzantine/Russia in its historical reality, refusing to admit its faults and contradictions, tending to glorify even such monsters as Ivan the Terrible, whose `greatness`, he believes, will be `recognised` in due time. [...] There was also a kind of background theme in his earlier work, the pastoral pictures of beautiful Russian nature, which the poet had all the better reason to enjoy for being a devout fisherman.[5] Autograph by Apollon Maikov of his poem `Pustinnik` (Hermit) The modernist critic Yuly Aykhenvald, analyzing the cliché formula that bonded `Maykov, Polonsky and Fet` into a solid group of similar-minded authors, alleged that Maykov `to a lesser extent than the other two freed himself from the habit of copying classics` and `in his earlier works was unoriginal, producing verse that shone with reflected light.` Not even his passionate love for classics could help the author submerge `wholly into the pagan element,` the critic opined.[32] He was a scholar of antiquity and his gift, self-admittedly `has been strengthened by being tempered in the fire of science.` As a purveyor of classicism, his very soul was not deep or naive enough to fully let this spirit in or embrace the antique idea of intellectual freedom. Poems, inhabited by naiads, nymphs, muses and dryads, are very pretty, and you can`t help being enchanted by these ancient fables. But he gives you no chance to forget for a moment that – what for his ancient heroes was life itself, for him is only a myth, a `clever lie` he could never believe himself.[32] All Maykov`s strong points, according to the critic, relate to the fact that he learned painting, and, in a way, extended the art into his poetry. Aykhenvald gives him unreserved credit for the `plasticity of language, the unequalled turn at working on a phrase as if it was a tangible material.` Occasionally `his lines are so interweaved, the verse looks like a poetic calligraphy; a scripturam continuam... Rarely passionate and showing only distant echoes of original inspiration, Maykov`s verse strikes you with divine shapeliness... Maykov`s best poems resemble statues, driven to perfection with great precision and so flawless as to make a reader feel slightly guilty for their own imperfection, making them inadequate to even behold what`s infinitely finer than themselves,` the critic argued.[32] Another Silver Age critic who noticed how painting and fishing might have influenced Maykov`s poetry was Innokenty Annensky. In his 1898 essay on Maykov he wrote: `A poet usually chooses their own, particular method of communicating with nature, and often it is sports. Poets of the future might be cyclists or aeronauts. Byron was a swimmer, Goethe a skater, Lermontov a horse rider, and many other of our poets (Turgenev, both Tolstoys, Nekrasov, Fet, Yazykov) were hunters. Maykov was a passionate fisherman and this occupation was in perfect harmony with his contemplative nature, with his love for a fair sunny day which has such a vivid expression in his poetry.`[33] Putting Maykov into the `masters of meditation` category alongside Ivan Krylov and Ivan Goncharov, Annensky continued: `He was one of those rare harmonic characters for whom seeking beauty and working upon its embodiments was something natural and easy, nature itself filling their souls with its beauty. Such people, rational and contemplative, have no need for stimulus, praise, strife, even fresh impressions... their artistic imagery growing as if from soil. Such contemplative poets produce ideas that are clear-cut and `coined`, their images are sculpture-like,` the critic argued.[33] Annensky praised Maykov`s gift for creating unusual combinations of colors, which was `totally absent in Pushkin`s verse, to some extent known to Lermontov, `a poet of mountains and clouds` ...and best represented by the French poets Baudelaire and Verlaine.` `What strikes one is Maykov`s poetry`s extraordinary vigor, the freshness and firmness of the author`s talent: Olympians and the heroes of Antiquity whom he befriended during his childhood years… must have shared with him their eternal youth,` Annensky wrote.[33] Maykov in 1868 D. S. Mirsky called Maykov `the most representative poet of the age,` but added: `Maykov was mildly `poetical` and mildly realistic; mildly tendentious, and never emotional. Images are always the principal thing in his poems. Some of them (always subject to the restriction that he had no style and no diction) are happy discoveries, like the short and very well known poems on spring and rain. But his more realistic poems are spoiled by sentimentality, and his more `poetic` poems hopelessly inadequate — their beauty is mere mid-Victorian tinsel. Few of his more ambitious attempts are successful.`[34] By the mid-1850s Maykov had acquired the reputation of a typical proponent of the `pure poetry` doctrine, although his position was special. Yet, according to Pryima, `Maykov was devoid of snobbishness and never saw himself occupying some loftier position even when mentioning `crowds`. His need in communicating with people is always obvious (`Summer Rain`, `Haymaking`, `Nights of Mowing`, The Naples Album). It`s just that he failed to realize his potential as a `people`s poet` to the full.` `Maykov couldn`t be seen as equal to giants like Pushkin, Lermontov, Koltsov, or Nekrasov,` but still `occupies a highly important place in the history of Russian poetry` which he greatly enriched, the critic insisted.[13] In the years of Maykov`s debut, according to Pryima, `Russian poetry was still in its infancy... so even as an enlightener, Maykov with his encyclopedic knowledge of history and the way of approaching every new theme as a field for scientific research played an unparalleled role in the Russian literature of the time.` `His spectacular forays into the `anthological` genre, as well as his translations of classics formed a kind of `antique Gulf Stream` which warmed up the whole of Russian literature, speeding its development,` another researcher, F. F. Zelinsky, agreed.[13] Maykov`s best poems (`To a Young Lady`, `Haymaking`, `Fishing`, `The Wanderer`), as well his as translations of the Slavic and Western poets and his poetic rendition of Slovo o Polku Igoreve, belong to the Russian poetry classics, according to Pryima.[13] Selected bibliography Poetry collections Poems by A.N.Maykov (1842) Sketches of Rome (Otcherki Rima, 1847) 1854. Poems (Stikhotvoreniya, 1854) The Naples Album (Neapolsky albom, 1858) Songs of Modern Greece (Pesni novoy Gretsii, 1860) Dramas Three Deaths (Tri smerti, 1857) Two Worlds (Dva mira, 1882) Major poems Two Fates (Dve sudby, 1845) Mashenka (1946) Dreams (Sny, 1858) The Wanderer (Strannik, 1867) Princess*** (Knyazhna, 1878) Bringilda (1888)

Herbert Džordž Vels Čovečanstvo rad, blagostanje i sreća lјudskoga roda 1-2 Originalni naslov: The Work, Wealth and Happiness of Mankind the Work, Wealth and Happiness of Mankind Izdavač: Narodno delo, Beograd iz 30 -tih godina, 1017 strana, 24 cm. Tvrd povez, ilustrovano,ćirilica. dobro očuvano.

DERI TIBOR LJUBAV - Pripovetke Gradska narodna biblioteka `ŽARKO ZRENJENIN` Z r e nj a n i n TIBOR DERI (1894-1977), znameniti mađarski pisac, evropskog ranga. Romani `Nedovršena rečenica`, `Niki`, `Jednouhi`, `Imaginarna reportaža s jednog američkog pop-festivala`, `I ljubav...` postali su klasična dela mađarske književnosti !!!!!! ........................................................... Izbor, prevod s mađarskog i pogovor SAVA BABIĆ P R I P O V E T K E 1O pripovedaka Devojka iz Praga Teokrit u Novoj Pešti Portugalska princeza Poseta Ljubav Klackalica Kapriči 1. Crv-brašnar 2. Odlučni lav 3. Mr. Džo Smit beži Jedno prepiodne u Balatonu .......................................................... Tekst na naslovnoj strani delimično izbledeo, prirodno, šta li? Latinica Tvrde korice Šiven povez 1 4 3 stranice Knjiga nije korišćena Solidan prinerak !!!!

60472) DEVETSTO TREĆA Majski prevrat , Dragiša Vasić , Beograd 1925, prilozi za istoriju Srbije od 8. jula 1900. do 17. januara 1907 , sadržaj : 1. Predgovor 2. Samostalna vladavina 3. Dve štampe i narodno raspoloženje 4. Dvadeset treći mart 5. Vojska. Postanak i razvitak oficirske zavere 6. Noć 28/29 maja 7. Zaverenička vlada. Promena ustava. Izbor Kralja. Dva gledišta o sankciji dela. Štampa 8. Osvrt na zaveru 9. Poslednji planovi i poslednje Kraljeve namere 10. Niška kontra-zavera 11. Kragujevačka kontra-zavera 12.Zavereničko pitanje antikvarna, tvrd povez, format 13,5 x 19 cm , zlatotisak, odlično očuvano, latinica , ilustrovano,prvo izdanje 212 strana,

ЗАРИЈА Р. ПОПОВИЋ ЖИВОТ И ДЕЛО ВЛАДИМИР ЦВЕТКОВИЋ НАРОДНА И УНИВЕРЗИТЕТСКА БИБЛИОТЕКА `ИВО АНДРИЋ` ПРИШТИНА 2 О О О ЗНАМЕНИТИ СРБИ КОСОВА И МЕТОХИЈЕ Књига 5 Р е ф е р е н ц е Детињство Младост Службовање у Врању (1878-1887) Прелазак у Београд, службовање и пензија Културна, јавна и политичка личност Документарно-фељтонистичка проза: `Пред Косовом` Приповедачки рад Рад на роману Косовска легенда Зарије Р. Поповића ............................................................ Брош Ћирилица 1 7 9 страница НЕКОРИШЋЕНО перфекТ гаранцијА кондицијА: 1О

Живот и прикљученија Димитрија Обрадовича нареченога у калуђерству Доситеја, њим истим списат и издат. Књ. 2 / Доситеј Обрадовић Београд : Српска књижевна задруга, 1893 (Београд : Штампано у штампарији Краљевине Србије) 140, XXИВ стр. ; 20 цм Српска књижевна задруга. коло 2 ; књ. 8 dobro očuvano, drvenom bojicom je neko dete pošaralo naslovnu stranu, može se obrisati Dimitrije Obradović (crkveno ime Dositej; Čakovo, 1739[1] ili 1742. — Beograd, 28. mart 1811[2]) bio je srpski prosvetitelj i reformator revolucionarnog perioda nacionalnog buđenja i preporoda. Bio je osnivač i profesor Velike škole, preteče Beogradskog univerziteta. Dositej je bio prvi popečitelj prosvete u Sovjetu i tvorac svečane pesme „Vostani Serbije“. Rođen je u rumunskom delu Banata tadašnje Austrije. Školovao se za kaluđera, ali je napustio taj poziv i krenuo na putovanja po celoj Evropi, gde je primio ideje evropskog prosvetiteljstva i racionalizma. Ponesen takvim idejama radio je na prosvećivanju svog naroda, prevodio je razna dela među kojima su najpoznatije Ezopove basne, a potom je i sam pisao dela, prvenstveno programskog tipa, među kojima je najpoznatije „Život i priključenija“. Njegovi ostaci počivaju u Beogradu, na ulazu u Sabornu crkvu, iako je njegova izričita želja bila da bude sahranjen pored Hajdučke česme u beogradskom Košutnjaku.[3] narečenoga u kaluđerstvu Dositeja drugi deo II dositeja obradovića dositej obradović

DAVID KOPERFILD 1-2 - Čarls Dikens Broj strana: 460+480 Povez: Tvrd Izdavač: Novo pokoljenje Godina izdanja: 1948 Dejvid Koperfild, jedan od najpoznatijih romana Čarlsa Dikensa, čitaocima donosi priču o teškom odrastanju junaka. Sećajući se svog detinjstva I mladosti, sada kao odrastao čovek, Dejvid pripoveda svoju sudbinu i dogodovštine. Školovanje, očekivana i neočekivana prijateljstva, prve ljubavi, pritajeni neprijatelji i borba protiv nepravde i surovosti samo su od nekih epizoda sa kojima će publika imati prilike da se upozna u ovom delu. Dikensovo naoštreno pero opisuje i verno postavlja pitanje predstavlja sliku devetnaestovekovnog engleskog društva, ali takođe, postavlja pitanja koliko se društvo do sada promenilo , i ima li Dejvida Koperfilda među nama. Zasigurno, Dejvid Koperfild je roman u kojem će mladi uživati, dok će se odrasli vratiti u detinjstvo. L. 3. O. 5. POL. 3

Herbert Džordž Vels: Čovečanstvo: rad, blagostanje i sreća lјudskoga roda. Knj. 1 i 2 Originalni naslov: The Work, Wealth and Happiness of Mankind the Work, Wealth and Happiness of Mankind Izdavač: Narodno delo, Beograd, 1936. 562 + 567-1017 str. Tvrd povez, dobro očuvano; jedna rihtna malo oštećena.

Spoljašnjost kao na fotografijama, unutrašnjost u dobrom i urednom stanju! Engleski Jezik! 1886, Leipzig, Bernhard Tauchnitz Retko !!! William Makepeace Thackeray: The History of Samuel Titmarsh and the Great Hoggarty Vilijam Makpis Takeri (engl. William Makepeace Thackeray; Kalkuta, 18. jul 1811 — London, 24. decembar 1863) bio je poznati engleski književnik epohe realizma.[1] Dobro poznajući više krugove engleskog društva, razvio se u jednog od najistaknutijih satiričara 19. veka koji ne škrtari na satiri i sarkazmu.[2] Pod uticajem prosvetitelja iz 18. veka, verovao je u poučno-etičku poruku književnog dela, pa je u svojim romanima prikazujući čitavu galeriju likova i njihove složene međusobne odnose, ismejavao mane savremenika. Prvobitno je sarađivao u časopisima i pod pseudonimima objavljivao eseje, satire i romane u nastavcima. Svetsku slavu doneo mu je roman „Vašar taštine“ s dopunskim naslovom — roman bez glavnog junaka, koji je u nastavcima izlazio 1847. i 1848.[3] U tom književnom remek-delu Takeri je epskim zamahom satirički prikazao društvene prilike i sve važnije predstavnike engleskog građanskog i aristokratskog društva.[4] Dela „Vašar taštine“ „Knjiga o snobovima“ „Virdžinijanci“ „Četiri Džordža“

Univerzitetski prof. dr VALTER MANOŠEK HOLOKAUST U SRBIJI VOJNA OKUPACIONA POLITIKA I UNIŠTIVANJE JEVREJA 1941-1942 SLUŽBENI LIST SRJ BEOGRAD 2007 a) JEVREJI - GENOCID - SRBIJA - 1941-1942 b) ŽRTVE FAŠIZMA - JEVREJI - SRBIJA - 1941-1942 c) HOLOKAUST - DRUGI SVETSKI RAT 1939 - 1945 - SRBIJA .............................................................. PREDGOVOE PROF. DR ČEDOMIR POPOV AUTOROV PREDGOVOR SRPSKOM IZDANJU (Beč, septembar 2007) PREVOD DELA SA NEMAČKOG (1993) R e f e r e n c e 1. `PODUHVAT KAZNENOG SUĐENJA` 2. VERMAHT I UBISTVA JEVREJSKIH MUŠKARACA U SRBIJI 3. OTPOR I KOLABORACIJA U SRBIJI 1941. GODINE 4. VERMAHTOVI POKOLJI SRPSKOG CIVILNOG STANOVNIŠTVA U JESEN 1941. 5. GUŠENJE GASOM JEVREJSKIH ŽENA I DECE IZ KONCLOGORA SAJMIŠTE 6. REZIME I KONAČNI ZAKLJUČCI ............................................................... TIRAŽ / S A M O/ 500 PRIMERAKA NAPOMENE I BIBLIOGRAFSKE REFERENCE UZ TEKST BIBLIOGRAFIJA REZIME I KONAČNI ZAKLJUČCI REGISTAR SKRAĆENICA REGISTAR IMENA LITERATURA TVRDE KORICE LATINICA 24 cm 220 STRANICA KOLEKCIONARSKI, 2007. ODLIČNO

Павле Соларић - Ново гражданско землеописаніе, перво На Езику Сербскомъ, у две части, Съ Землеписникомъ одъ XXXVII Листова. Часть 1-2, у Венеціи : у Пане Өеодосїева, 1804 godine Tvrd povez. Knjiga je u dobrom stanju. Ima manje oštećenje korica na donjem delu rikne. Listovi su blago zatalasani, kao i korice. Na predlistu i naslovnom listu ima potpise. Knjiga je kompletna i nigde nije cepana. Ćošak jednog lista je savijen ka unutra jer je usled štamparske greške duži od ostalih. Na koricama kao i na naslovnom listu drugog dela nalepljene nalepnice biblioteke Petra Stojadinovića generalnog direktora novosadske štamparije Zastava d. d. 474 + 246 strana Pavle Solarić - Novo graždansko zemljeopisanie u dve časti, Kod Pane Teodosijeva, Venecija 1804 godine

56332) AK 1 HRVATSKA PROZA XX STOLJEĆA 1 i 2 , uredio Milan Begović , Zagreb 1942 , Dvije knjige koje sadrže odabrana djela hrvatske proze prve polovice 20. stoljeća, odabrana i uređena od strane Milana Begovića, književnika koji je `proživio sva književna strujanja i pokrete, seizmografskom osjetljivišću na sve njih reagirao i izražavao ih sjajnom tehnikom.` (M. Fotez) SADRŽAJ: Napomena nakladnika Moderni hrvatski pripovjedači Janko Leskovar (1861.) PATNIK MISAO NA VJEČNOST Ivo Vojnović (1857.-1929.) U MAGLI Branimir Livadić (1871.) POGODI, TKO TE UDARI Viktor Car Emin (1870.) BUDAKOVA ŽELJA Antun Gustav Matoš (1873.-1914.) NEKAD BILO SAD SE SPOMINJALO Dinko Šimunović (1873.-1933.) DUGA MULJIKA Ivana Brlić Mažuranić (1874.-1938.) NI U KOGA Milan Begović (1876.) DVA BIJELA HLJEBA Vladimir Nazor (1876.) GUBAVAC Milan Ogrizović (1877.-1923.) BOG Andrija Milčinović (1877.-1941.) PRVA BOL Josip Kosor (1879.) KOBNI SLUČAJ Joza Ivakić (1879.-1932.) U SVATOVIMA Milutin Cihlar-Nehajev (1880.-1931.) GODIVA . Franjo Horvat Kiš (1876.-1924.) SJENKE. Zdenka Marković (1884.) POPLAVA Ivan Kozarac (1885.-1910.) KUKAVAC Rikard Nikolić DVA GALEBA Prilog reprodukcijama Popis slika. SADRŽAJ PROZE II. Predgovor Marin Bego: Dvie sestre Mato Hanžeković: Podvadjena gniezda. Stjepko Trontl: Pet cigareta . Mile Budak: Pod gorom Slavko Kolar: Svoga tiela gospodar Slavko Kolar: Ili jesmo ili nismo Ivo Andrić: Put Alije Gjerzeleza Ivo Andrić: Izpovied Verka Škurla Ilijić: Hanumica. Ulderiko Donadini: Dunja . Ahmed Muradbegović: Post Mira Miholjević: Stari Job. Stjepko Vrtar: Nikola. tvrd povez, format 17 x 21,5 cm , ilustrovano, latinica, 437 + 355 strana *AK 1

GUTAČI BLEDE VATRE Američki roman Vladimira NABOKOVA ZORAN PAUNOVIĆ profesor anglistike na Filološkom fakultetu u BeoGradu PROSVETA B e o G r a d 1 9 9 7 SAVREMENI ESEJ a) NaboKov, VladiMir Vladimirovič (1899-1977) - Romani ............................................................. 1. Uvod: OD SIRINA DO NABOKOVA 2. Stvarni život i fiktivna biografija: STVARNI ŽIVOT SEBASTIJANA NAJTA 3. Snaga i slabost antiUtopije: U ZNAKU NEZAKONITO ROĐENIH 4. Uzvišeno u trivijalnom: LOLITA 5. NeUspela osveta pripovedača: PNIN 6. Monstruozno obličje remek-dela: BLEDA VATRA 7. Porodična hronika kao istorija romana: ADA 8. Iluzija života i stvarnost pripovedanja: PROZIRNE STVARI 9. Pišem, dakle poStojim: POGLEDAJ ARLEKINE 10. EPILOG: Stvarni život Vladimira Nabokova ............................................................. Sumary Bibliografija Latinica Mek povez 400 stranica ODLIČAN PRIMERAK NEKORIŠĆENO NEOTVORENO E k s t r a !!!!!!!!!!!!!

JORGE LUIS BORGES SABRANA DJELA 1923-1982 Knjiga 6 1975-1982 Grafički zavod Hrvatske Z a g r e b 1 9 8 5 Knjiga 6 1975-1982 R e f e r e n c e Željezni novčić (1976) Povijest noći (1977) Lozinka (1981) 25. kolovoza 1983. i druge neobjavljene priče (1982) Latinica Tvrde korice Šiven povez Obeleživač stranica 2 3 9 stranica Praktično nekorišćeno

PRIRODA U DELU ŽILIJANA GRAKA dr JELENA NOVAKOVIĆ Filološki fakultet u Beogradu Beograd 1988 a) Grak Žilijen (1909- ) - Motivi - Priroda b) Grak Žilijen (1909- ) - Bibliografija ....................................................... - Ova knjiga predStavlja delimično izmenjen i sažet tekst doktorske disertacije odBranjene na Filološkom fakultetu u Beogradu 6. decembra 1980. godine pred komisijom koju su sačinjavala profesori: dr Mihajlo Pavlović (mentor), dr Ivan Dimić i dr Slobodan Vitanović. 1. Priroda i `ovostrani svet` 2. Priroda i `onostrani svet` 3. Priroda i čovek - Beleške i komentari - Resume - Bibliografija: str 247-262 Ćirilica, Mek povez, 262 str LEPO OČUVANO Bez posvete, bez potpisa, bez podvlačenja! DB21

O STILI MARSELA PRUSTA LEO ŠPICER Službeni glasnik B e o g r a d 2 O 1 2 POJMOVNIK Rečenični ritam Elementi usporavanja Vezivna sredstva Odnos prema jeziku Pripovedač ........................................................ LEO ŠPICER (1887-1960) Poznati romanista hispanista, jedan od utemeljivača stilističke kritike, doktorirao 1910, odlično znao više od deset svetskih jezika, predavao u Beču, Bonu, Marburgu i Kelnu. Kad su nacionalsocijalisti došli na vlast u Nemačkoj, emigrirao 1933. u Tursku - Istambul, gde je osnovao katedru za evropsku filologiju, 1936. prelazi u SAD gde je osnovao katedru za romanistiku na Univerzitetu Džon Hopkins, autor velikog broja lingvističkih analiza najznačajnijih dela francuske, italijanske i španske književnosti... Latinica 153 stranice NEKORIŠĆENO PerfekT KOndicija: 1O

Za I, II i II razred drzavnih trgovackih akademija. Izdavac: Izdavacka knjizarnica Tome Jovanovica i Vujica Beograd-`Zeleni venac`,1939.godine. Stranica : 95+107 Stanje : Koriscene, podvlacene olovkom mestimicno, posebno prvi deo, drugi znacajno manje, pisano ponegde sa strane olovkom obicno, pisno po unutrasnjem delu korica, predlistu. Tekst ceo vidljiv, kompaktne obe knjige, spolja fino ocuvane.

1 - Hercegovačke narodne pjesme, koje samo Srbi Muhamedove vjere pjevaju 1890 g 2 - Narodne PODRUGAČICE 1883 g 3 - Narodne humoristične Gatalice i Varalice 1884 g 4 - Narodne basne 1909 g 5 - Srpske narodne igre... Koje se zabave radi po sastancima igraju 1889 pet knjiga objedinjeno u jednu celinu tvrd povez odlicno ocuvano samo na jednoj strani trag hemijske vidi sliku kolekcionarski primerak r3

Spoljašnjost kao na fotografijama, unutrašnjost u dobrom i urednom stanju! Retko !!! Mirko Divković (Zagreb, 1843. – Samobor, 1924.) zagrebački gramatičar, leksikograf i prevoditelj Životopis Pohađao je Klasičnu gimnaziju u Zagrebu koju je završio 1863. godine.[1] Divković je gotovo cijeli svoj profesorski radni vijek (od 1868. do 1908. godine) proveo u zagrebačkoj Klasičnoj gimnaziji,[2] a 26 godina bio joj je i ravnatelj tj. od 1882. do 1908. godine.[3] Prevodio je s ruskog jezika. Djela `Oblici i sintaksa hrvatskoga jezika za srednje škole`, Zagreb, 1-1903., 2-1908., 3-1917. `Latinsko-hrvatski rječnik za škole`, Zagreb, 1900. `Oblici`, 1879 Divković, Mirko, hrvatski filolog i leksikograf (Zagreb, 24. VI. 1843 – Samobor, 12. I. 1924). Autor udžbenika za hrvatski jezik (Oblici hrvatskoga jezika, 1879; Sintaksa hrvatskoga jezika, 1881) pisanih pod jakim utjecajem Đ. Daničića i poslije spojenih u Hrvatsku gramatiku. Po F. Miklošiču sastavio Oblike staroslovjenskoga jezika za školu (1883). Osim vježbi iz latinskoga, autor opsežnoga Latinsko-hrvatskoga rječnika za škole (1900). Prevodio s ruskoga, najčešće Turgenjeva, Tolstoja i pučke pripovijetke....

Spoljašnjost kao na fotografijama, unutrašnjost u dobrom i urednom stanju! Pecati ! Na kraju knjige ima preskrabana posveta koliko mi se cini. Dimitrije Obradović (crkveno ime Dositej; Čakovo, 1739[1] ili 1742. — Beograd, 28. mart 1811[2]) bio je srpski prosvetitelj i reformator revolucionarnog perioda nacionalnog buđenja i preporoda. Bio je osnivač i profesor Velike škole, preteče Beogradskog univerziteta. Dositej je bio prvi popečitelj prosvete u Sovjetu i tvorac svečane pesme „Vostani Serbije“. Rođen je u rumunskom delu Banata tadašnje Austrije. Školovao se za kaluđera, ali je napustio taj poziv i krenuo na putovanja po celoj Evropi, gde je primio ideje evropskog prosvetiteljstva i racionalizma. Ponesen takvim idejama radio je na prosvećivanju svog naroda, prevodio je razna dela među kojima su najpoznatije Ezopove basne, a potom je i sam pisao dela, prvenstveno programskog tipa, među kojima je najpoznatije „Život i priključenija“. Njegovi ostaci počivaju u Beogradu, na ulazu u Sabornu crkvu, iako je njegova izričita želja bila da bude sahranjen pored Hajdučke česme u beogradskom Košutnjaku.[3] narečenoga u kaluđerstvu Dositeja drugi deo II dositeja obradovića dositej obradović

Pun naslov: ILLUSTRIERTER FÜHRER DURCH WIEN UND UMGEBUNG VON MORIZ BERMANN VERFASSER VON `ALT- UND NEU-WIEN`, `DER WIENER STEFANSDOM UND SEINE SEHENSWÜDIGKEITEN` ETC. ETC. MIT 115 ILLUSTRATIONEN, 1 PLAN VON WIEN UND 5 ORIEN- TIRUNGSKARTEN SECHSTE, VERMEHRTE UN NEU BEARBEITETE AUFLAGE /ILUSTROVANI VODIČ KROZ BEČ i okolinu Od Morica Bermana autora dela `Stari i novi Beč`, `Bečki Stefansdom i njegove znamenitosti` itd. itd. Sa 115 ilustracija, 1 planom Beča i 5 orijentacionih karata Šesto, prošireno i prerađeno izdanje Izdavač:...............A. Hartleben`s Verlag Biblioteka:...........Hartleben`s Illustrierter Führer. Nr. 2. Mesto izdanja:.....Wien. Pest. Leipzig. Godina izdanja:...1895. Format:...............11 x 16 cm Povez:.................tvrdi, zlatotisak Broj strana:.........XXXII + 256 + 61 nenumerisana strana sa ilustracijama, na nemačkom Težina:................400 g Stanje knjige:......uglovi hrbata su neznatno pohabani, papirni spoj prednjih korica i predlista je razdvojen - platneni je neoštećen, hartija je blago potamnila, ostalo je potpuno očuvano (103/22-261-kp/650)

DRUGDE PUTOPISI ALEKSANDAR TIŠMA PROSVETA B e o g r a d 1 9 9 6 IZABRANA DELA R e f e r e n c a Beograd Biciklom prema jugu Novi sad Sremski Karlovci Beograd Zemun Lipovačke šume Stepojevac Lazarevac Valjevo Kosjerić Trebava Titovo Užice Užička Požega Kukovo Guča Čačak Kraljevo Podunavci Vrnjačka Banja Goč Rašovka Predole Bare Baljevac Đumor Raška Jerina Lešak Slatina Kosovska Mitrovica Srednja Evropa Engleska Francuska Švajcarska Ženeva Cirih Lozana Bern Berlin Indija Amerika Njujork Manhatan Vašington Filadelfija Los Anđeles Crnci Belci ............................................................ Broš Latinica 2 9 3 stranice NEKORIŠĆENO perfekT kondicijA: 1O

Veoma dobro očuvano, zacepljen predlist i ex libris bivšeg vlasniku na najavnoj strani prve knjige, inače veoma dobro očuvano, bez pisanja, podvlačenja, rikna kompaktna, nije izlizana... Autor - osoba Andrić, Ivo, 1892-1975 = Andrić, Ivo, 1892-1975 Naslov Pripovetke / Ivo Andrić Vrsta građe kratka proza Jezik srpski Godina 1924 Izdavanje i proizvodnja Beograd : Srpska književna zadruga, 1924 (Beograd : `Makarije`) Fizički opis 117 str. ; 20 cm Zbirka Srpska književna zadruga ; ǂkolo ǂ27, ǂknj. ǂ179 (Karton) Napomene Prema napomeni na str. [3] većina pripovjedaka je ranije štampana u `Srpskom književnom glasniku`, `Jugoslovenskoj Njivi` i `Prosveti` Rečnik turskih reči i provincijalizama: str. 115-117. Autor - osoba Andrić, Ivo, 1892-1975 = Andrić, Ivo, 1892-1975 Naslov Pripovetke. [Knj.] 2 / Ivo Andrić Vrsta građe kratka proza Jezik srpski Godina 1936 Izdavanje i proizvodnja Beograd : Srpska književna zadruga, 1936 (Beograd : D. Gregorić) Fizički opis 122 str. ; 20 cm Zbirka Srpska književna zadruga. ǂkolo ǂ39 ; ǂknj. ǂ262 U Matici rođenih crkve Svetog Ivana Krstitelja u Travniku, pod rednim brojem 70, stoji da je 9. oktobra 1892. godine rođen Ivan, sin Antuna Andrića, podvornika i Katarine Andrić, rođene Pejić. Budući veliki srpski pisac rodio se u Travniku sticajem okolnosti, dok mu je mati boravila u gostima kod rodbine. Andrićevi roditelji bili su Sarajlije: očeva porodica decenijama je bila vezana za ovaj grad u kojem se tradicionalno bavila kujundžijskim zanatom. Osim bavljenja istim poslom, članove roda Andrićevih vezivala je i zla kob tuberkuloze: mnogi piščevi preci, uključujući i sve njegove stričeve, podlegli su joj u mladosti, a sam Andrić bez oca je ostao kao dvogodišnji dečak. Suočavajući se sa besparicom, Katarina Andrić svoga jedinca daje na čuvanje muževljevoj sestri Ani i njenome mužu Ivanu Matkovšik u Višegrad. U gradu koji će, više nego ijedno drugo mesto, obeležiti njegovo stvaralaštvo, gledajući svakodnevno vitke stubove na Drini ćuprije, Andrić završava osnovnu školu, a potom se vraća majci u Sarajevo, gde 1903. godine upisuje Veliku gimnaziju, najstariju bosansko-hercegovačku srednju školu. Za gimnazijskih dana, Andrić počinje da piše poeziju i 1911. godine u Bosanskoj vili objavljuje svoju prvu pesmu „U sumrak“. Kao gimnazijalac, Andrić je vatreni pobornik integralnog jugoslovenstva, pripadnik je naprednog nacionalističkog pokreta „Mlada Bosna“ i strastveni je borac za oslobođenje južnoslovenskih naroda Austrougarske monarhije. Dobivši stipendiju hrvatskog kulturno-prosvetnog društva „Napredak“, Andrić oktobra meseca 1912. godine započinje studije na Mudroslovnom fakultetu Kraljevskog sveučilišta u Zagrebu. U gradu na Savi, on pomalo uči, pomalo posećuje salone, družeći se sa zagrebačkom inteligencijom od koje će na njega posebno veliki uticaj imati dvadeset godina stariji Matoš. Naredne godine prelazi u Beč gde sluša predavanja iz istorije, filosofije i književnosti. Bečka klima mu ne prija i on, hereditarno opterećen osetljivim plućima, često boluje od upala. Obraća se za pomoć svom gimnazijskom profesoru i dobrotvoru, Tugomiru Alaupoviću, i već sledeće godine prelazi na Filosofski fakultet Jagelonskog univerziteta u Krakovu. Intenzivno uči poljski jezik, upoznaje kulturu i sluša predavanja vrhunskih profesora. Sve vreme piše refleksivne pesme u prozi, a u junu mesecu 1914. godine Društvo hrvatskih književnika u Zagrebu objavljuje mu šest pesama u prozi u panorami Hrvatska mlada lirika. Na Vidovdan, 28. juna 1914. godine, na vest o sarajevskom atentatu i pogibiji Nadvojvode Franaca Ferdinanda, Andrić pakuje svoje oskudne studentske kofere i napušta Krakov: zatomljeni instinkt bivšeg revolucionara goni ga u zemlju, na poprište istorije. Odmah po dolasku u Split, sredinom jula, austrijska policija hapsi ga i odvodi prvo u šibensku, a potom u mariborsku tamnicu u kojoj će, kao politički zatvorenik, ostati do marta 1915. godine. Među zidovima marburške tamnice, u mraku samice, „ponižen do skota“, Andrić intenzivno piše pesme u prozi. Po izlasku sa robije, Andrić biva bačen u konfinaciju u Ovčarevo i Zenicu gde ostaje sve do leta 1917. godine. Zbog ponovljene bolesti pluća, odmah odlazi na lečenje u Zagreb, u čuvenu Bolnicu Milosrdnih sestara, stecište hrvatske inteligencije koja se klonila učešća u ratu, na strani Austrije. Tu Andrić, zajedno sa konte Ivom Vojnovićem, dočekuje opštu amnestiju i aktivno se uključuje u pripreme prvog broja časopisa Književni jug. bolnica milosrdnih sestara 1918Istovremeno, pažljivo dovršava knjigu stihova u prozi koja će pod nazivom Ex Ponto biti objavljena u Zagrebu 1918. godine sa predgovorom Nika Bartulovića. U Zagrebu ga i zatiče slom Austrougarske monarhije, a potom i ujedinjenje i stvaranje Kraljevine Srba, Hrvata i Slovenaca. U danima koji neposredno prethode formalnom ujedinjenju, Andrić u tekstu „Nezvani neka šute“ objavljenom u zagrebačkim Novostima, oštro odgovara na prve simptome nesloge u državi koja još nije ni stvorena i poziva na jedinstvo i razum. Nezadovoljan atmosferom u Zagrebu, Andrić ponovo moli pomoć dr Tugomira Alaupovića i već početkom oktobra 1919. godine počinje da radi kao činovnik u Ministarstvu vera u Beogradu. Sudeći prema pismima koja piše prijateljima, Beograd ga je srdačno prihvatio i on intenzivno učestvuje u književnom životu prestonice, družeći se sa Crnjanskim, Vinaverom, Pandurovićem, Sibetom Miličićem i drugim piscima koji se okupljaju oko kafane Moskva. Već početkom 1920. godine Andrić započinje svoju vrlo uspešnu diplomatsku karijeru postavljenjem u Poslanstvu pri Vatikanu. Te godine zagrebački izdavač Kugli objavljuje novu zbirku pesama u prozi Nemiri, a izdavač S. B Cvijanović iz Beograda štampa pripovetku „Put Alije Đerzeleza“. S jeseni 1921. godine Andrić je postavljen za činovnika u Generalni konzulat Kraljevine Srba, Hrvata i Slovenaca u Bukureštu, a iste godine započinje saradnju sa Srpskim književnim glasnikom objavljujući u broju 8 priču „Ćorkan i Švabica“. Godine 1922. premešten je na rad u Konzulat u Trstu. Tokom te godine štampa još dve pripovetke („Za logorovanja“ i „Žena od slonove kosti“), ciklus pesama „Šta sanjam i šta mi se događa“ i nekoliko književnih prikaza. Početkom 1923. godine on je vicekonzul u Gracu. Budući da nije završio fakultet, preti mu otkaz u Ministarstvu spoljnih poslova. Između mogućnosti da fakultet završi državnim ispitom ili odbranom doktorata, Andrić bira drugu mogućnost i u jesen 1923. godine upisuje se na Filosofski fakultet u Gracu. Tokom ove godine Andrić je objavio nekoliko pripovedaka od kojih se neke svrstavaju među njegova najznačajnija prozna ostvarenja: „Mustafa Madžar“, „Ljubav u kasabi“, „U musafirhani“ i „Dan u Rimu“. U junu mesecu 1924. godine u Gracu je odbranio doktorsku tezu Razvoj duhovnog života u Bosni pod uticajem turske vladavine. Petnaestog septembra, pošto je odbranio doktorat, stiče pravo da se vrati u diplomatsku službu. Krajem godine prelazi u Beograd u Političko odeljenje Ministarstva inostranih dela. Ove godine pojavljuje se Andrićeva prva zbirka priča u izdanju Srpske književne zadruge u koju, pored nekih već objavljenih u časopisima, ulaze i nove – „U zindanu“ i „Rzavski bregovi“. Na predlog Bogdana Popovića i Slobodana Jovanovića, godine 1926, Ivo Andrić biva primljen za člana Srpske akademije nauka i umetnosti, a iste godine u Srpskom književnom glasniku objavljuje pripovetke „Mara milosnica“ i „Čudo u Olovu“. Oktobra meseca biva postavljen za vicekonzula Generalnog konzulata Kraljevine Jugoslavije u Marseju. Sledeće godine, tri meseca provodi na radu u Generalnom konzulatu u Parizu: gotovo sve slobodno vreme u Parizu Andrić provodi u Nacionalnoj biblioteci i Arhivu Ministarstva inostranih poslova proučavajući istorijsku građu o Bosni s početka devetnaestog veka i čitajući korespondenciju Pjera Davida, francuskog konzula u Travniku. S proleća 1928. godine premešten je za vicekonzula u Poslanstvu u Madridu. Te godine objavljuje priče „Olujaci“, „Ispovijed“ i „Most na Žepi“. Sredinom sledeće godine prelazi u Brisel, na mesto sekretara poslanstva, a u Srpskom književnom glasniku pojavljuje se njegov esej „Goja“. Već 1. januara 1930. godine u Ženevi počinje da radi kao sekretar stalne delegacije Kraljevine Jugoslavije pri Društvu naroda. Te godine objavljuje esej o Simonu Bolivaru, priču „Kod kazana“ i tekst „Učitelj Ljubomir“. U Beogradu sledeće godine izlazi i druga knjiga pripovedaka kod Srpske književne zadruge u kojoj se, pored priča ranije objavljenih u časopisima, prvi put u celini štampaju „Anikina vremena“, a u kalendaru-almanahu sarajevske Prosvjete pojavljuje se putopis „Portugal, zelena zemlja“. Godine 1932. Andrić objavljuje pripovetke „Smrt u Sinanovoj tekiji“, „Na lađi“ i zapis „Leteći nad morem“. U martu mesecu 1933. godine vraća se u Beograd kao savetnik u Ministarstvu inostranih poslova. Iako intenzivno piše, ove godine objavljuje samo pripovetku „Napast“ i nekoliko zapisa. Iste godine, 14. novembra pismom odgovara dr Mihovilu Kombolu i odbija da njegove pesme budu uvrštene u Antologiju novije hrvatske lirike: „...Ne bih nikada mogao učestvovati u jednoj publikaciji iz koje bi principijelno bili isključeni drugi naši meni bliski pesnici samo zato što su ili druge vere ili rođeni u drugoj pokrajini. To nije moje verovanje od juče nego od moje prve mladosti, a sad u zrelim godinama takva se osnovna vrednovanja ne menjaju“. Sledeće godine unapređen je za savetnika 4. grupe 2. stepena Ministarstva inostranih poslova. Postaje urednik Srpskog književnog glasnika i u njemu objavljuje pripovetke „Olujaci“, „Žeđ“ i prvi deo triptiha „Jelena, žena koje nema“. Postaje načelnik političkog odeljenja Ministarstva inostranih dela 1935. godine i stanuje u hotelu Ekscelzior. Štampa pripovetke „Bajron u Sintri“, „Deca“, esej „Razgovor s Gojom“ i jedan od svojih značajnijih književnoistorijskih tekstova – „Njegoš kao tragični junak kosovske misli“. Tokom sledeće godine Srpska književna zadruga štampa drugu knjigu Andrićevih pripovedaka koja, među onima koje su objavljivane u časopisima, sadrži još i priče „Mila i Prelac“ i „Svadba“. Andrićeva diplomatska karijera ide uzlaznom linijom i on u novembru mesecu 1937. godine biva imenovan za pomoćnika ministra inostranih poslova. Te godine dobija i visoka državna odlikovanja Poljske i Francuske: Orden velikog komandira obnovljene Poljske i Orden velikog oficira Legije časti. Iako okupiran diplomatskom službom, Andrić tokom ove godine objavljuje priče „Trup“ i „Likovi“, a iste godine u Beču, prikupljajući građu o konzulskim vremenima u Travniku, u Državnom arhivu proučava izveštaje austrijskih konzula u Travniku od 1808. do 1817. godine - Paula fon Mitesera i Jakoba fon Paulića. Početkom 1938. godine pojavljuje se prva monografija o Andriću iz pera dr Nikole Mirkovića. Diplomatska karijera Ive Andrića tokom 1939. godine doživljava vrhunac: prvog aprila izdato je saopštenje da je Ivo Andrić postavljen za opunomoćenog ministra i izvanrednog poslanika Kraljevine Jugoslavije u Berlinu. Andrić stiže u Berlin 12. aprila, a 19. aprila predaje akreditive kancelaru Rajha - Adolfu Hitleru. U jesen, pošto su Nemci okupirali Poljsku i mnoge naučnike i pisce odveli u logore, Andrić interveniše kod nemačkih vlasti da se zarobljeništva spasu mnogi od njih. Političari u Beogradu, međutim, ne računaju baš uvek na svoga poslanika, i mnoge kontakte sa nemačkim vlastima održavaju mimo Andrića. Pisac i u takvim okolnostima objavljuje: pripovetka „Čaša“ i zapisi „Staze“ i „Vino“ izlaze u Srpskom književnom glasniku tokom 1940. godine. U rano proleće 1941. godine Andrić nadležnima u Beogradu nudi ostavku: „...Danas mi u prvom redu službeni a zatim i lični mnogobrojni i imperativni razlozi nalažu da zamolim da budem ove dužnosti oslobođen i što pre povučen sa sadašnjeg položaja...“ Njegov predlog nije prihvaćen i 25. marta u Beču, kao zvanični predstavnik Jugoslavije prisustvuje potpisivanju Trojnog pakta. Dan posle bombardovanja Beograda, 7. aprila, Andrić sa osobljem Poslanstva napušta Berlin. Potom odbija ponudu nemačkih vlasti da ide u bezbedniju Švajcarsku, ali bez ostalih članova Ambasade i njihovih porodica: bira povratak u okupirani Beograd. Novembra meseca biva penzionisan, ali odbija da prima penziju. Živi povučeno u Prizrenskoj ulici, kao podstanar kod advokata Brane Milenkovića. Odbija da potpiše Apel srpskom narodu kojim se osuđuje otpor okupatoru. Piše pismo Srpskoj književnoj zadruzi da za vreme dok „narod pati i strada“ ne objavljuje njegove pripovetke. U tišini svoje iznajmljene sobe, piše prvo Travničku hroniku, a krajem 1944. godine okončava i Na Drini ćupriju. Oba romana objaviće u Beogradu nekoliko meseci po završetku rata, a koncem 1945. godine u Sarajevu izlazi i roman Gospođica. Prve posleratne godine postaje predsednik Saveza književnika Jugoslavije i potpredsednik Društva za kulturnu saradnju sa Sovjetskim Savezom i većnik III zasedanja ZAVNOBIH-a. Tokom 1946. godine živi u Beogradu i Sarajevu, postaje redovan član SANU. Te godine, među ostalim, objavljuje pripovetke „Zlostavljanje“ i „Pismo iz 1920. godine“. Sledeće godine postaje član Prezidijuma Narodne skupštine NR Bosne i Hercegovine i objavljuje „Priču o vezirovom slonu“, nekoliko tekstova o Vuku Karadžiću i Njegošu, a tokom 1948. godine prvi put će biti štampana „Priča o kmetu Simanu“. Narednih nekoliko godina vrlo aktivno bavi se javnim poslovima, drži predavanja, govori na javnim skupovima, kao član različitih delegacija putuje u Sovjetski Savez, Bugarsku, Poljsku, Francusku, Kinu. Objavljuje uglavnom kraće tekstove, odlomke pripovedaka, priče „Bife Titanik“ (1950), „Znakovi“ (1951), „Na sunčanoj strani“, „Na obali“, „Pod Grabićem“, „Zeko“ (1952), „Aska i vuk“, „Nemirna godina“, „Lica“ (1953). Godine 1954. postaje član Komunističke partije Jugoslavije. Prvi potpisuje Novosadski dogovor o srpskohrvatskom književnom jeziku. Te godini štampa u Matici srpskoj Prokletu avliju , a pripovetka „Igra“ pojavljuje se 1956. godine. Godine 1958. u šezdeset šestoj godini, Ivo Andrić se venčava sa svojom dugogodišnjom ljubavlju - Milicom Babić, kostimografom Narodnog pozorišta iz Beograda, udovicom Nenada Jovanovića. Sa ženom se seli u svoj prvi stan – u Ulici Proleterskih brigada 2a. Te godine objavljuje pripovetke „Panorama“, „U zavadi sa svetom“ i jedini predgovor koji je ikada za neku knjigu napisao: uvodni tekst za knjigu Zuke Džumhura „Nekrolog jednoj čaršiji“. „Za epsku snagu“ kojom je „oblikovao motive i sudbine iz istorije svoje zemlje“, Ivo Andrić je 1961. godine dobio Nobelovu nagradu. Besedom „O priči i pričanju“ u kojoj je izložen njegov spisateljski vjeruju, 10. decembra 1961. godine zahvalio je na priznanju. Iako su do tada njegova dela prevođena na mnoge jezike, posle dodeljivanja nagrade počinje veliko interesovanje sveta za dela pisca sa Balkana i njegovi se romani i pripovetke štampaju na preko trideset jezika. Iako odbija mnoge pozive, tih godina Andrić boravi u Švedskoj, Švajcarskoj, Grčkoj, Egiptu. Celokupni iznos Nobelove nagrade poklonio je iz dva dela bibliotečkom fondu Bosne i Hercegovine. Uz to, veoma često učestvuje u akcijama pomoći bibliotekama i daje novac u humanitarne svrhe. Godine 1963. kod Udruženih izdavača (Prosveta, Mladost, Svjetlost i Državna založba Slovenije) izlaze prva Sabrana dela Ive Andrića u deset tomova. Naredne godine boravi u Poljskoj gde u Krakovu biva promovisan za počasnog doktora Jagelonskog univerziteta. Piše veoma malo, ali se njegove knjige neprekidno preštampavaju i u zemlji i inostranstvu. U martu mesecu 1968. godine Andrićeva žena Milica umire u porodičnoj kući u Herceg Novom. Sledećih nekoliko godina Andrić nastoji da svoje društvene aktivnosti svede na najmanju moguću meru, mnogo čita i malo piše. Zdravlje ga polako izdaje i on često boravi u bolnicama i banjama na lečenju. Trinaestog marta 1975. godine svet će napustiti jedan od najvećih stvaralaca na srpskom jeziku, pisac mitotvorne snage i mudri hroničar balkanskog karakazana. MG62